MyLovely is currently listed as ugc, variable boundaries. Its relationship options still need clearer documentation. A first-hand quality verdict has not been published yet.
Community research dossierOldest supporting source checked . No score or quality verdict is implied.
The 30-second answer
Could MyLovely fit what you want?
Buyer verdict · no score
MyLovely is an adult community-content browser companion with women, men, a marketed trans-companion path, and an explicit gay AI boyfriend route. It publishes six Premium and Premium Plus monthly, quarterly, and annual totals with 300 or 450 monthly tokens, but token consumption, native-app delivery, representation parity, security remediation, and product quality remain unresolved.
+
It may fit if…
You want an explicitly marketed gay AI boyfriend path or a broadly labeled trans-companion path without treating those as proof of representation quality.
You want browser-based chat, memory, custom characters, images, voice messages, video, and adult roleplay in one product.
You want exact monthly, quarterly, or annual term totals and can evaluate generic token economics separately.
!
Pause before paying if…
You need a native app, verified phone installation, offline behavior, push notifications, or tested platform parity.
You need nonbinary inventory, broader LGBTQ+ audience support, or demonstrated gay and trans representation quality rather than first-party landing-page claims.
You need simple usage economics; current plans publish 300 or 450 monthly tokens without per-feature consumption rates.
You need only-you access, zero sharing, end-to-end encryption, or immediate complete deletion as verified guarantees; the policy permits content review and processor sharing and lists multiyear retention categories.
You need evidence of current security remediation: Have I Been Pwned lists a verified, sensitive April 2026 My Lovely AI breach affecting 106,271 accounts, while root cause, notification, remediation, and current security posture remain unestablished here.
A source-checked decision profile plus a purposeful public-experience dossier. The selected reports are not a score, consensus, or substitute for first-hand testing. How evidence labels work
Want the differences side by side?
Starts with MyLovely and CrushOn.AI. You can change either product; no winner or score is assigned.
No reviewed external product link is active yet. Model the likely cost first, then compare a close alternative before deciding whether this product deserves a closer look.
Any future external link must be clearly labeled and pass destination, merchant, disclosure, and publication review first.
Recent public experience · not a score
What current creators would make us verify
Three current creator items from two publisher families repeat MyLovely's combined chat-and-media breadth, low-price positioning, and male companion availability. They do not establish media consistency, token runway, gay-path parity, or memory quality, and no current independent public-user item meets the repository's date window. Every live row has a commercial or method caveat. Treat this as a short pre-purchase checklist—not a score, community consensus, or recommendation.
Why people still consider it
One browser product combines women and men companion paths, chat, images, short video, and six published plan totals; two current creator rows also point to a male path.
What to test before paying
Whether the male or gay path has the same creation fields, relationship framing, voices, media access, and continuity you need.
How many messages or acceptable image and video outputs the listed monthly tokens actually buy, including retries and failed jobs.
Whether one companion keeps an ordinary fact and established tone across more than one session.
Whether one representative image and video stay consistent enough for your use before a longer commitment.
Whether the publisher provides a current, dated incident-response and remediation record that meets your privacy needs.
What the sample actually is
3 selected items across 3 linked records: 1 YouTube and 2 web reviews.
through . 3 items carry a recorded commercial, method, or source-identity concern.
Coded in 3 of 3
Images, short video, and media consistency
All three current creator items treat media breadth as part of the attraction; one reports only middling image consistency and very short clips.
Useful for defining a test, not a quality verdict; no shared prompts, retained outputs, failure ledger, or matched plan exists.
Coded in 3 of 3
Listed price and token runway
Low-price or free-path framing appears in every live creator row, while none establishes action-level token burn or a typical all-in month.
The canonical price table controls listed charges. Creator value language cannot establish checkout, usage cost, or a cheapest-product conclusion.
Coded in 2 of 3
Male and gay companion path
Two Companion Rater items describe male availability, matching the current first-party gay-boyfriend route at a narrow discovery level.
One publisher family and no current independent gay-use report; feature depth, respectful outcomes, and parity remain unresolved.
Coded in 2 of 3
Memory and continuity
Two affiliate reviews praise memory, but neither provides a reproducible multi-session artifact set.
Commercially concentrated and method-limited; long-term or cross-session memory quality remains unresolved.
Read this as a checklist, not market sentiment. A freshness-adjudicated three-item live subset from a 13-row dated research ceiling. The current set contains only commercially connected creator coverage from two publisher families; ten older rows remain research history and contribute nothing to live counts. Counts describe only these documents.
The first selected item reaches its refresh deadline on . A recheck cannot silently reset the age of the underlying experience.
Before you pay
What could make you pause
Listed plan prices do not establish included usage, overage economics, tax, or checkout totals.
No completed hands-on evidence run is recorded.
Straight answers
Questions buyers ask before choosing MyLovely
Does MyLovely support AI boyfriends and gay users?
A current first-party route explicitly markets gay chat and AI boyfriends, and two current same-family creator items describe male availability. That supports discovery, not parity: roster depth, creation controls, voices, media access, continuity, boundaries, and respectful outcomes remain untested.
How far do MyLovely tokens go?
Current web listings pair Premium with 300 monthly tokens and Premium Plus with 450, across monthly, quarterly, and annual charges. The reviewed records do not establish action-level message, image, voice, or video consumption, failed-job treatment, top-ups, tax, or a typical all-in month.
Does MyLovely have good memory?
Two current affiliate reviews praise memory, but neither supplies reproducible multi-session logs or a shared callback rubric. No current independent user item meets the repository date window, so memory quality remains unresolved.
What does the MyLovely breach record establish?
Have I Been Pwned records a verified, sensitive breach dated 2026-04-07 affecting 106,271 accounts and describes exposed prompts and generated-image links. It does not establish root cause, user notification, remediation, an independent audit, or present-day security.
How we know
Open the evidence only when you need it.
The decision above uses dated documentation and keeps public reports, first-hand checks, and official claims separate. Expand any section to inspect the scope and sources.
Public reports and creator research (3 selected items)
What the selected public record does—and does not—show
A freshness-adjudicated three-item live subset from a 13-row dated research ceiling. The current set contains only commercially connected creator coverage from two publisher families; ten older rows remain research history and contribute nothing to live counts. Counts describe only these documents.
Conflicts preserved in the dossier
Media breadth does not establish consistent output: All three creator items feature images or short video, while the only current item with a concrete limitation reports middling image consistency and very short clips. No matched artifact set resolves the difference.
Male availability is not gay-path parity: Two same-family creator items and current first-party routes support discovery of a male path. They do not establish equal roster depth, creation controls, voices, media models, continuity, boundaries, or respectful outcomes.
Memory praise exceeds the shared method: Two affiliate reviews praise memory without supplying reproducible logs, a common companion, a callback rubric, or independent replication.
Low-price creator framing does not settle token-funded value: Every live creator item uses low-price or free-path framing. None establishes action-level token consumption, retries, failed-job treatment, top-ups, tax, or typical monthly use.
Limits on the conclusion
This is a purposeful three-item current subset from a 13-row dated research ceiling, not representative polling or a satisfaction rate.
The live set contains no current independent public-user report and reduces to two commercially connected publisher families; the Companion Rater video and web review are one family.
Every live row has an affiliate, commercial, or method concern and supplies no independently reviewable result ledger.
SynthLust describes roughly two weeks of use although its site methodology says reviews require at least 30 days, and its breach statement is stale; those conflicts limit the row rather than changing the independent security record.
Companion Rater's web review incorrectly says no public breach existed as of June 2026, while its video and web review are one publisher family rather than independent corroboration.
Six Trustpilot rows, one Reddit comparison, and three older web reviews remain dated research history because they exceed the repository's 30- or 45-day live publication window; none contributes to the three-item counts or approval readiness.
The Have I Been Pwned record is independent security evidence outside the sentiment set. It establishes dated breach history and an affected-account count, not root cause, notification, remediation, or present-day security.
No account, paid plan, media task, gay-path parity audit, token ledger, billing flow, deletion flow, incident response, or longitudinal memory behavior was tested by this publication.
Linked source surfaces and selected-item locators
A direct link identifies one source record. A title/date locator on a moving feed helps identify the selected row but is not an immutable copy; the feed can reorder or remove it.
No first-hand result is published for this product yet. That limits claims about conversational quality, memory, persona stability, checkout totals, and whether account workflows actually succeed; it does not erase the usefulness of current price and policy documentation.
Open the complete claim ledger
The decision summary above is intentionally simple. Inspect each current value, source, check date, and unresolved conflict below. Product and app-store destinations remain text-only until their outbound destinations pass a separate review.
Public facts and their evidence state
Decision factor
Current value
Evidence state
Freshness
Checked
Claim support
Product model
UGC, variable boundaries
editorial inference
current
MyLovely homepage and browser product(official product)
MyLovely public community gallery(official product)
MyLovely is an adult-only companion and media service with a public community gallery and user publishing controls. The adult service envelope is clear, while public character and media inventory can vary; moderation quality was not tested.
Relationship modes
friendship; romance; roleplay; adult roleplay
editorial inference
current
MyLovely homepage and browser product(official product)
MyLovely gay AI boyfriend and LGBT chat route(official product)
MyLovely trans AI companion route(official product)
MyLovely company and product claims(official product)
Current first-party pages advertise friendly conversation, romance, roleplay, and explicit adult roleplay. This normalization describes marketed modes, not observed conversation quality.
Companion genders
women; men
merchant claimed
current
MyLovely homepage and browser product(official product)
MyLovely gay AI boyfriend and LGBT chat route(official product)
MyLovely trans AI companion route(official product)
Current first-party pages directly market AI girlfriends and AI boyfriends. The separate trans route is recorded under trans representation; inventory depth and gender parity were not tested.
Trans representation
trans unspecified
merchant claimed
current
MyLovely trans AI companion route(official product)
The dedicated route directly markets transgender AI companions but does not establish stable trans-woman and trans-man filters, nonbinary inventory, or representation quality and parity.
Audience support
gay
merchant claimed
current
MyLovely gay AI boyfriend and LGBT chat route(official product)
The official gay-chat page explicitly markets Gay AI Chat and AI boyfriend paths and says the service is inclusive for LGBT users. This supports only the narrow gay-audience value; broader LGBTQ+ user parity remains untested.
Platforms
web
merchant claimed
current
MyLovely homepage and browser product(official product)
The homepage documents browser use without a download on phone or computer. A standalone web manifest shows PWA intent, but OS-specific installation and native-store identities remain unverified.
Browser delivery is explicit and a standalone web manifest shows install intent. No OS-specific install guide, successful PWA install, service-worker/offline behavior, push support, matched native-store identity, or platform parity result is established.
Listed features
text chat; memory; image generation; voice messages; video; custom persona; adult text; adult media
merchant claimed
current
MyLovely homepage and browser product(official product)
MyLovely gay AI boyfriend and LGBT chat route(official product)
MyLovely trans AI companion route(official product)
MyLovely public community gallery(official product)
Current first-party pages advertise chat, memory, character creation, images, voice messages, videos, editing, and adult text/media. No synchronous voice-call claim was found; feature quality, limits, public-content moderation, and parity remain untested.
Privacy & account operations
privacy policy: documented; data export: support assisted; billing path: direct; cancellation: self service; refunds: case by case; account deletion: support assisted
merchant claimed
current
MyLovely AI girlfriend pricing and cancellation FAQ(official product)
Official pages document controller-assisted access, portability, and erasure requests; settings-based cancellation; direct card or crypto billing; and conditional refund guidance. The policy permits authorized input/output review and processor sharing and lists account-log retention up to 3–5 years after last activity and payment/tax retention of 7–10 years. Have I Been Pwned independently lists a verified, sensitive 2026-04-07 My Lovely AI breach affecting 106,271 accounts; it describes exposed prompts and generated-image links while its structured data classes list email addresses and social-media profiles. No current remediation, privacy control, or account-operation outcome was tested.
Pricing — Premium monthly
$12.99 per month (web; Global USD listing); included units not recorded
merchant claimed
current
MyLovely current Premium plan configuration(official product)
The current public application configuration assigns 300 generic tokens per month to this tier. Token consumption by chat, image, voice, and video is not published, and generic tokens are not representable in the structured allowance fields.
Pricing — Premium quarterly
$29.97 per quarter (web; Global USD listing); included units not recorded
merchant claimed
current
MyLovely current Premium plan configuration(official product)
The current public application configuration assigns 300 generic tokens per month to this tier. Token consumption by chat, image, voice, and video is not published, and generic tokens are not representable in the structured allowance fields.
Pricing — Premium annual
$49.80 per year (web; Global USD listing); included units not recorded
merchant claimed
current
MyLovely current Premium plan configuration(official product)
The current public application configuration assigns 300 generic tokens per month to this tier. Token consumption by chat, image, voice, and video is not published, and generic tokens are not representable in the structured allowance fields.
Pricing — Premium Plus monthly
$19.99 per month (web; Global USD listing); included units not recorded
merchant claimed
current
MyLovely current Premium plan configuration(official product)
The current public application configuration assigns 450 generic tokens per month to this tier. Token consumption by chat, image, voice, and video is not published, and generic tokens are not representable in the structured allowance fields.
Pricing — Premium Plus quarterly
$44.98 per quarter (web; Global USD listing); included units not recorded
merchant claimed
current
MyLovely current Premium plan configuration(official product)
The current public application configuration assigns 450 generic tokens per month to this tier. Token consumption by chat, image, voice, and video is not published, and generic tokens are not representable in the structured allowance fields.
Pricing — Premium Plus annual
$71.96 per year (web; Global USD listing); included units not recorded
merchant claimed
current
MyLovely current Premium plan configuration(official product)
The current public application configuration assigns 450 generic tokens per month to this tier. Token consumption by chat, image, voice, and video is not published, and generic tokens are not representable in the structured allowance fields.
Change history (0 confirmed events)
What has changed
No material change event has been confirmed in the current record. We do not infer a change from marketing copy alone.
Additional background sources (0)
Additional background sources
Every other eligible source for this profile is cited in the claim ledger or public-experience dossier.
Continue comparing
Related product profiles
C
CrushOn.AI
UGC, variable boundaries
CrushOn.AI is currently listed as ugc, variable boundaries. Current sources list friendship, romance, roleplay, and adult roleplay among its relationship options. A first-hand quality verdict has not been published yet.
UGC, variable boundarieswomenmen
Community researchChecked 2026-07-12
G
GPTGirlfriend
UGC, variable boundaries
GPTGirlfriend is currently listed as ugc, variable boundaries. Current sources list romance, roleplay, and adult roleplay among its relationship options. A first-hand quality verdict has not been published yet.
UGC, variable boundarieswomenmen
Source-checked profileChecked 2026-07-12
IA
Idyll AI
Mixed boundary / unresolved
Idyll AI is currently listed as mixed boundary / unresolved. Current sources list friendship, romance, and roleplay among its relationship options. A first-hand quality verdict has not been published yet.